About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck and crew falsely suggest message of Planned Parenthood Super Bowl ad was "don't keep your kid"

February 08, 2010 5:49 pm ET

From the February 8 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by scubcap647 (February 08, 2010 5:55 pm ET)
      11 2
      I'm not suprised that people like him are trying to confuse pro-choice message. It's about choice not advocacy for abortions. It's bout being able to choose for yourself, not forcing your morals on someone else. But some people won't allow themselved to listen to the message. Now if Beck ever stated that they understood it's about choice and he personally would not want his family or friends to choose that, then that's fine. That would actually suprise me.
      Report Abuse
        • Author by dogbreath (February 08, 2010 6:07 pm ET)
          5 1
          They can barely tie their own shoes.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (February 08, 2010 6:34 pm ET)
          5 1
          Of course, this kind of reasoning is lost these people... Conservatives can't do analogies.

          Or comedy, fact checking, or truth telling!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (February 08, 2010 8:50 pm ET)
        2 9
        Planned Parenthood is about killing the offspring of black people in the United States. They are disproportionately represented in black neighborhoods and they perform a disproportionate number of abortions on black girls. It is a racist eugenics organization, funded with taxpayer dollars.
        78% of their clinics are in minority communities. Blacks make up 12% of the population, but 35% of the abortions in America. <http://www.blackgenocide.org>
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mescal (February 08, 2010 10:04 pm ET)
          6 1
          Look, eddiebaby... African Americans have historically been disproportionately poor in this country. It only stands to reason that it is women who are very young and very poor who far more likely to avail themselves of the choice to terminate an unplanned pregnancy, putting off having children until they are in a better financial and psychological position to raise them. African American birth rates are NOT undergoing any noticeable plunge, so there is nothing that would in any way correlate with your paranoid, Dreckian assertions about the choice movement operating out racist, eugenics motives. This is simply another right wing lie.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Tbone Slickens (February 08, 2010 11:49 pm ET)
            1 4
            Margaret Sanger disagrees with your assessment.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mescal (February 09, 2010 2:31 am ET)
              2  
              Margaret Sanger died over half a century ago. To use her foolish agreement with the pseudo science of eugenics to smear the pro choice movement is extremely dishonest, and done simply to cover up your own twisted desire to control women by limiting their abilities to control their own bodies. I mean, do you also oppose the legality of birth control methods such as the pill and condoms, and the open and public dissemination of reproductive information, just because Margaret freakin' Sanger also supported them?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by spinny (February 08, 2010 10:32 pm ET)
             
          • Fifty-four percent of women who have abortions had used a contraceptive method (usually the condom or the pill) during the month they became pregnant. Among those women, 76% of pill users and 49% of condom users report having used their method inconsistently, while 13% of pill users and 14% of condom users report correct use.

          • Forty-six percent of women who have abortions had not used a contraceptive method during the month they became pregnant. Of these women, 33% had perceived themselves to be at low risk for pregnancy, 32% had had concerns about contraceptive methods, 26% had had unexpected sex and 1% had been forced to have sex.

          • Eight percent of women who have abortions have never used a method of birth control; nonuse is greatest among those who are young, poor, black, Hispanic or less educated.

          • About half of unintended pregnancies occur among the 11% of women who are at risk for unintended pregnancy but are not using contraceptives. Most of these women have practiced contraception in the past

          www.guttmacher.org

          Eugenics:Aborton :: Murder:Suicide

          Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (February 09, 2010 1:23 am ET)
          3  
          "Planned Parenthood is about killing the offspring of black people in the United States. They are disproportionately represented in black neighborhoods and they perform a disproportionate number of abortions on black girls. It is a racist eugenics organization, funded with taxpayer dollars."



          Well -- if that's true, I would think Riverboat Bill "you could abort every black baby in this country and your crime rate would go down" Bennett, and John "make more [white] babies 'cause in 25 years this country will be majority Hispanic" Gibson would be OVERJOYED . . .

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Ruby (February 09, 2010 7:41 am ET)
          2  
          Abortion only accounts for 3% of the services provided by Planned Parenthood. Poor neighborhoods/poor women can greatly benefit from some of the services made available to them through Planned Parenthood like access to birth control (you know, so abortions don't have to happen) and access to necessary regular gynecological exams that otherwise a low-income woman without insurance may go years without.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (February 08, 2010 6:20 pm ET)
      7  
      Glenn, I have been pregnant and given birth to twins. I have raised them to the educated young adult women that they are. I have talked to them for years about being responsible human beings. I don't believe in abortion, I told them why and I can say that they are also against having abortions or irresponsible sex, for that matter. However, we all support a woman's right to choose. No woman ever chooses to have an abortion lightly. For some, the decision is incredibly difficult. For others, they choose to have the baby. I think you need to respect that choice, whatever it is. You don't respect women, and you don't respect the choices of women. You need to keep your mouth shut.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cbcbcb (February 09, 2010 12:14 am ET)
           
        Why should pro-lifer's/anti abortion people keep their mouths shut? It is about protecting the unborn. No matter how miniscule the life is it is ridded of the chance to become a person.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (February 08, 2010 6:46 pm ET)
      6 1
      Beck and crew falsely suggest message of Planned Parenthood Super Bowl ad was "don't keep your kid"


      Becky's right.

      The real message was: "don't keep your kid -- he may grow up to play for Alabama":

      [http://justgrits.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/tim-tebow-crying_500.jpg]
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (February 08, 2010 7:13 pm ET)
      4 12
      I'm glad my mother was pro life, I bet you are glan yours was too.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (February 08, 2010 7:25 pm ET)
        6 1
        Wow. That's deep. Can I use that?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (February 08, 2010 7:30 pm ET)
          7 1
          Har ! They sure do like to exploit the special needs children to make their point.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (February 08, 2010 7:33 pm ET)
        5  
        "I'm glad my mother was pro life, I bet you are glan yours was too." -- seahags5-11



        Actually, I'm not really "glan" anything . . .

        Report Abuse
      • Author by dirtylittlereligion (February 08, 2010 8:12 pm ET)
           
        Aw, Jeez. I wonder how I would feel if my mother decided to abort me. Oh! That's right. NOTHING! I wouldn't give a sh!t, because I couldn't give any sh!t. Neither would you. If you really want to argue the philosophical implications of abortion and it's effect on existence, don't bring up a ridiculous "wingnut-logic" point.

        My mother is not "pro-life" (Anti-choice is what you are. Because nobody is "anti-life"). My mother is pro-choice and CHOSE to give birth to me.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 08, 2010 8:26 pm ET)
        4  
        So...you think any woman who has a child is "pro-life"? What an idiotic assumption...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (February 08, 2010 10:17 pm ET)
        6  
        My mother was pro choice. She CHOSE to have three children. She always said that she didn't believe in abortion, and would never have had one. She also always said that she could never tell another woman that she HAD to carry her pregnancy to term... that each woman had to look into her own conscience and make her own decision. She felt that it was not the state's business to make moral choices FOR the individual.

        For all the talk by conservatives about getting the government out of running our lives, you sure do want the state to be intimately and coercively involved in our most private decisions.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by cbcbcb (February 09, 2010 12:17 am ET)
             
          No conservative is saying we should get rid of murder laws, so why is it hypocritical to want to impose laws against abortion in cases when there is no rape, danger to the health....
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (February 08, 2010 11:26 pm ET)
        3  
        I'm not glad your mother was pro-life.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NewBee (February 08, 2010 11:44 pm ET)
        3  
        I'm glad my mother was pro life, I bet you are glan[sic} yours was too.
        But, we're not glad yours was.

        Everyone is pro-life. Some of us are also pro-choice, aka pro-freedom.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (February 08, 2010 8:15 pm ET)
      3  
      Beck and crew falsely suggest message of Planned Parenthood Super Bowl ad was "don't keep your kid"

      WOW! That was a smear!

      Sean James and Al Joyner respond to the Tebow Super Bowl ad

      While I did not care over the real reason as to why Focus on the Family wanted to show their commercial during the Super Bowl, which I think was a pure political move, but not illegal to do so. If Mrs. Tebow wanted to have her son. That is her CHOICE! Planned Parenthood's commercial was talking about letting women make their own decisions. Which is in the process of being oppressed by the reich-wing.

      D@MN $HAME!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (February 09, 2010 2:15 am ET)
        3
      It's not about forcing moral decisions on women; it's about what constitutes life. Say a baby was born on March 10th. Would it have been murder if the baby had been aborted on March 9th? What about February 9th? January 9th? Do we even draw a line anywhere or simply consider it human life upon conception?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (February 09, 2010 2:53 am ET)
        2  
        It is EXACTLY about the state imposing its moral decisions upon the individual. It is about the state forcing women who face an unwanted pregnancy to become human incubators in order to appease the religious beliefs of its conservative political base. It is about the opinions of the hive mind being elevated above the rights of the individual to control their own body.

        So, MC, let me ask you, then. Where do YOU draw the line? Conception? Do you oppose the right of a woman to use a morning-after pill? Does a zygote... an embryo that has yet to develop a brain and, therefor, lacks a human mind or even the most rudimentary level of human consciousness... have rights that supersede that of a woman to determine the conditions of her own existence?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MagCynic (February 09, 2010 3:24 am ET)
            2
          I believe with our current medical technology we can't truly tell when that fertilized eggs becomes a human. Surely you would agree that aborting a baby one day before it would've been born naturally is murder? And like I said before, where is the line? If medical science can't determine it then we shouldn't take chances. Period. Let's err on the side of caution. Therefore, until some expert in the field tells us otherwise, life begins at conception.

          And, no, it's really not about forcing any religious convictions upon somebody. You sound like Glenn Beck when you say stuff like that.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mescal (February 09, 2010 4:17 am ET)
            5 1
            If we err, MC, we should err on the side of freedom and the rights of the individual. When a person has cosmetic surgery, it is human life that is being lifted from their overly large nose or is being hoovered up out of their love handles. After all, every cell that is discarded contains the full spectrum of human DNA. But the real question is, is it a human being? Obviously not. Neither is an embryo. It is a mass of human tissue containing the basic DNA blueprint and potential to BECOME a human being. It is consciousness... that complex evolutionary miracle of the individual mind... that makes it a human being. A woman, thus, should not be forced into carrying out an unwanted pregnancy just because YOU are having difficulties defining your terms. It's still HER body, and until you can say with scientific certainty that that fetus has consciousness and awareness, we should respect her right to control her own body.

            Also, abortions that are done late into a pregnancy are overwhelmingly done as the result of a nonviable fetus... one that is certain to quickly and miserably die as the result of the non-development of its brain and/or other vital organs. There is little sense in forcing an already grieving family to play out an emotionally-draining and financially ruinous scenario whose final outcome has already been determined by objective medical reality.

            The other main reason for late-term abortions is when the delivery of that fetus is apt to result in the death of the mother, or at least will seriously compromise her health.

            Either way, it is not for you or I to inject ourselves into another person's most intimate and horrifically painful of decisions, because, ultimately, it is neither you nor I who will have to live with the physical and emotional aftermath of that decision. You don't believe in abortion? Fine. Don't have one then. Just don't presume the right to impose your personal beliefs upon the lives of others.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by peace4all (February 09, 2010 8:13 am ET)
              2  
              very well stated.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by OldCon (February 09, 2010 9:14 am ET)
                3
              "The other main reason for late-term abortions is when the delivery of that fetus is apt to result in the death of the mother, or at least will seriously compromise her health."

              I don't understand why it's ok to induce labor to abort a baby late term but delivering the baby could kill the mother.


              "it is not for you or I to inject ourselves into another person's most intimate and horrifically painful of decisions"
              Yeah, but it's ok for school officials to send one of our kids to an abortion clinic without our knowledge for this minor to endure this "most intimate and horrifically painful of decisions" all by themselves.

              The pro abortion left got all worked up about the Tim Tebow
              ad without even seeing it. It was harmless. If they hadn't made such a big deal over it nobody would have known what the message was! You people on the left have to lighten up.


              Report Abuse
              • Author by raddave43 (February 09, 2010 11:40 am ET)
                2  
                No school sends kids to an abortion clinic. The teens go on their own, and by the medical privacy laws, after they are a certain age, I believe it is 12, it is their right to privacy from parents. There is no such movement as the "pro-abortion" it is pro-choice. We could easily call you the "pro-force a woman to re-live the day she was raped, every day for the rest of her life group"
                Report Abuse
              • Author by PP_brainwashes (February 09, 2010 11:41 am ET)
                  3
                Way to go Beck! They got it right on! Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion chain in America - of course they want people to think they are all accepting, b/c they don't want to lose customers. Last year PP had a profit of 85 MILLION DOLLARS. The year before they made over 100 MILLION DOLLARS. Why did PP make a YouTube video? Because they too just like NOW are afraid that people will actually REALIZE that abortion is KILLING your child and PP certainly wouldn't want people to realize that b/c then they will lose their customers and their money! Duh! Planned Parenthood continues to try to brainwash the American people, but guess what...America is becoming more and more pro-life and ROE will be REVERSED!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by NewBee (February 09, 2010 7:29 pm ET)
                  1  
                  I'm in favor of retroactively aborting all people who misuse the caps-lock key.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (February 09, 2010 11:45 am ET)
            2  
            Actually our medical technology can tell us when a fetus becomes viable enough to probably survive away from the mother, it is in the 26th week that it happens. That is why it is used as the cut-off for regular abortions.

            What if I was to say "until some expert in the fields tells us otherwise, life begins at birth?"
            Report Abuse